• open panel

Jeremiah Owyang misses an "M"

 

Ray Wang and Jeremiah Owyang of the Altimeter Group just published a major new report: Social CRM: The New Rules of Relationship Management. It’s a real tour-de-force, summarizing the social media landscape, categorizing and rating the tools available for marketers to engage with it, and laying out 18 practical use cases for social CRM ranked by market demand and technical maturity.

The report sets out five “M”s that an organization should have in place in order to execute on the use cases (the summaries are mine):

Monitoring: Listen to how & where your brand is mentioned in the social sphere
Mapping: Link social identities to customer records
Management: Business rules to tie social channels into business functions
Middleware: Provides the “glue” for data flow from the social world to the enterprise
Measurement: If you can’t measure it, how do you know it’s working?

All great stuff, but don’t you find it a bit passive? How does an organization turn all this internal processing into actual engagement in the social sphere? I think Ray and Jeremiah need a sixth “M”: Messaging.

Taking the report’s Baseline Processes format, I’d describe Messaging like this:

Why It’s Important
To maximize the reach and effectiveness of your permission marketing, you need to be able to engage with your customers where and when they want you to, by whatever channel they choose. If they don’t find your messaging convenient, they will pass over you. Even if you have their permission, if you give them the wrong message in the wrong place they may ignore you, or worse still, shut you off completely.

Resources and Requirements
The ability to message on all channels: email, mobile, social, web: Universal Messaging
The ability to target individuals on all channels: Universal Identity
The ability to segment and personalize on all channels: Universal Preferences
The ability to measure response on all channels: Universal Measurement

What they don’t always tell you
Think in terms of a universal messaging strategy, covering all channels. If you segregate mobile, social and email permission marketing, you will miss opportunities to add value to your communication. Your customers care how and where you reach them, but you should concentrate on what you’re saying to them when you do.

Vendors to Watch
For modesty’s sake I’ll leave this part to you!

Here at OTOlabs we’ve been giving a lot of thought to the challenges of engaging your customers beyond the email inbox – to mobile, social and in the living room. We’re holding a  webinar about it at 11am on May 29, called From Email to Universal Messaging: Reaching the Multichannel Consumer. There’s a second session at 2pm the same day. If you’re as fired up by the Social CRM report as we are, it would be great if you could join us.

  • http://marktamis.wordpress.com Mark Tamis

    Hi Chris,

    Although I can understand the need for consistent messaging, the basic premise of Social CRM as a customer engagement strategy is that you not only send a message, but also listen to what customers are saying, understand what makes them tick, and then engage them on thir terms.

    Only then will you have a chance that they are receptive to your message, increase your conversion rates and reduce churn. If you do not, the opportunity of gaining customer understanding that can be turned into actionable insights will be lost, and your campaign will be marketing 1.00001 through a new channel, with as much effectiveness as your current 1.0 campaigns (if you’re lucky).

    And to illustrate http://marktamis.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/scrmcartoon.jpg :)

    Regards,
    Mark

  • http://web-strategist.com/blog Jeremiah Owyang

    I really appreciate the time you took to read the report, and come back with a thoughtful response (even referencing the framework content). Ray and I have chatted about this, and are both impressed.

    We agree with you.

    Messaging should be part of the 5Ms process and should result in the company actually responding to folks. We intended that the framework (the other use cases) would result in brands responding. (Such as Rapid Marketing Response, or Rapid Sales Response), and it would be embedded there.

    The reason why we didn’t call it out as a single “M” is that some of the use cases are just about listening (Marketing insights), and brands may not respond to customers. You are right, however, as there will be messaging internally inside the organization.

    So in summary, we agree with your addition, but think the messaging falls within each of the specific use cases.

    I’ll cross link to this post, thank you!

  • http://www.otolabs.com cpointon

    @Mark – I absolutely agree, and love the cartoon! That’s the benefit of the Universal Messaging concept: if you know the identity of your customers in multiple modalities, but they have given you permission to contact them by one or two, you can make the join and enable the dialog. For instance if you’re a store and you monitor for retweets of special offers, if you know that Twitter ID “fanofstore”, who’s spreading your offers to her followers, is actually your email subscriber “franthefan@fransplace.com”, you can put that contact on a “special” track in your CRM efforts.

    @Jeremiah – Thanks for taking my thoughts into account. I’m glad to hear that you & Ray consider messaging to be part of the DNA of an SCRM effort.

© 2007-2011 One to One Global, Inc.